COM/OLE/en: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
Sv (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „You can use one of two strategies to interface to COM objects: * use the builtin COM interface (an extra plugin is required) * use a Java or DOTNET bridge to l…“) |
K (DOTNET -> .NET) |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
You can use one of two strategies to interface to COM objects: |
You can use one of two strategies to interface to COM objects: |
||
* use the builtin COM interface (an extra plugin is required) |
* use the builtin COM interface (an extra plugin is required) |
||
* use a Java or |
* use a Java or .NET bridge to let Java / .NET talk to the service. |
||
The first option is faster, as it avoids the additional inter-process-communication. |
The first option is faster, as it avoids the additional inter-process-communication. |
||
Aktuelle Version vom 11. Januar 2018, 11:20 Uhr
You can use one of two strategies to interface to COM objects:
- use the builtin COM interface (an extra plugin is required)
- use a Java or .NET bridge to let Java / .NET talk to the service.
The first option is faster, as it avoids the additional inter-process-communication. However, the current internal COM framework only supports call-out, but no call-in. This means that call backs or COM servers cannot be implemented (currently) with the builtin COM framework.
